Comparo Test : CBZ Vs. Fiero Vs. YBX
Beginning
with the Hero Honda CD 100, almost 15 years ago, four stroke bikes were
looked upon as economy champions. This continued even with the launch
of the Bajaj (4S and Caliber) and Kinetic (K4-100) four stroke bikes.
Indeed, the Kinetic K4-100 took this concept even farther by doing kashmir
to Kanyakumari in less than 40 litres, returning a mileage of over 90
kms per litre ! All these bikes had less than eight horsepower (BHP).
This concept persisted till Escorts launched its YBX @ two years ago
when people discovered that four stroke can also mean power and speed.
When Hero Honda launched the CBZ last year, people learnt what style
and comfort meant. And with the launch of the Suzuki Fiero last month,
people learnt that power, beauty and ECONOMY can be combined in a four
stroker !
Thus today, apart from Enfield Bullet, you have the three above-named
modern four stroke bikes producing double digit power (BHP) from three
Indo-Japanese motorcycle majors.
How do you decide which one to buy? Which is the best? Which is the
fastest? Which is the cheapest? Which gives the best mileage? Which
gives best value for money?
|
|
|
Suzuki
Fiero |
Hero
Honda CBZ |
Yamaha
YBX |
I did comprehensive
tests on all three bikes over an extended period and distance and measured
a lot of parameters. These parameters were then put thru mathematical
models to arrive at the final result(s) as you can find from the tables
below. The specifications of these bikes as claimed in the manufacturers
literature are as follows:
| xxx |
CBZ |
Fiero |
YBX |
| BHP
(PS) |
12.8 |
12.0 |
11.0 |
| @RPM |
8000 |
7500 |
8500 |
| Torque
(Nm) |
12.6 |
10.5 |
10.6 |
| Compression
Ratio (CR) |
8.5 |
9.4 |
10.0 |
| Dry
Weight (kg) |
135 |
115 |
100 |
| Weight
with one rider of 65 kg. |
200 |
180 |
165 |
| Engine
displacement (cc) |
156.8 |
147.5 |
123.7 |
| Effect
of Specifications on Rider response |
| Power
to weight ratio with one rider of 65 kg. (PS/kg) |
0.064 |
0.067 |
0.067 |
| Pulling
power with one rider of 65 kg (Torque/kg) |
0.063 |
0.058 |
0.064 |
| Power
efficiency (PS/cc) |
0.082 |
0.081 |
0.089 |
| Torque
efficiency (Nm/cc) |
0.080 |
0.071 |
0.086 |
| Engine
Life Factor - ELF (100,000 divided by CR x RPM) |
1.47 |
1.42 |
1.18 |
| TOTALS |
1.759 |
1.697 |
1.486 |
In these above
five parameters derived from manufacturers specifications, the higher
the figure, the better the EXPECTED performance. Thus on paper, CBZ
is best, next is Fiero and last is YBX.

I actually raced each bike to the limit to see what top speed it could
do. I did panic braking. Locking the wheels and skidding, to measure
the distance in which it comes to a complete stop. I used a stop watch
to measure the time which it took to achieve a speed of 60 kph from
zero. Then I rode each bike in different traffic conditions with measured
amounts of petrol to find out its fuel consumption. Thus I have actually
measured performance figures on fuel consumption, top speed, zero to
sixty acceleration and braking distance. For braking distance and time
for zero to sixty, lower the figure better it is, while for top speed
and fuel average, higher figure is better. To convert top speed and
fuel average figures into laterally add-able (lower is better) numbers,
I have taken their reciprocals i.e., divide 100 by the obtained figure.
| xxx |
CBZ |
Fiero |
YBX |
| 1. |
Actual
Top speed (km/hr)
Higher figure is better |
103 |
105 |
100 |
| 1a. |
Reciprocal
of #1 above
Lower figure is better |
0.971 |
0.952 |
1.000 |
| 2. |
Zero
to sixty (in seconds)
Lower figure is better |
6.29 |
5.62 |
6.99 |
| 3. |
Braking
distance (metres) -
60 kph to zero
Lower figure is better |
13.24 |
14.00 |
15.44 |
| 4. |
Overall
fuel consumption. -
kms per litre
Higher figure is better |
44.125 |
50.500 |
51.675 |
| 4a. |
Reciprocal
of #4 above
Lower figure is better |
2.27 |
1.98 |
1.94 |
| x |
TOTAL
(Lower is better) |
22.771 |
22.552 |
25.370 |
Lateral
addition of all "lower is better" figures gives the best performer.
Thus Fiero is best, followed by CBZ and trailed by YBX.
Reciprocal of above total, divide 100 by each figure to give higher
is better figure (for later use). Results remain same.
Having seen best from specifications and best on-the-ground performer,
let us look at rider conveniences and quantify them.
RIDER CONVENIENCES : (5=best ; 3=less than best ; 0=non existent)
| xxx |
CBZ |
Fiero |
YBX |
| Ease
of Locking |
5 |
3 |
5 |
| Ease
of kick-starting |
0 |
5 |
5 |
| EKS
(Engine Kill Switch) |
0 |
5 |
0 |
| Tacho |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Trip
meter |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Day
Flash |
0 |
5 |
5 |
| Gear
Shifting |
2 |
5 |
5 |
| TOTAL |
17 |
23 |
20 |
Since higher figure is better in terms of rider conveniences, Fiero
is best, followed by YBX and trailed by CBZ.
Finally everything boils down to price. So what do these bikes cost?
On Road Pune prices on 20 May 2000 were as follows:
| CBZ
(drum) |
Rs.59,675 |
Points=1 |
(difference=Rs.6,219) |
| Fiero
(drum) |
Rs.53,456 |
Points=3 |
(difference=Rs.3,961) |
| YBX
(drum) |
Rs.49,495 |
Points=5 |
xxx |
|
Now in order to find out the best value for money, just add the four
HIGHER IS BETTER totals of all the four dimensions Thus :

Bikes |
Points |
CBZ |
24.149 |
Fiero |
32.127 |
YBX |
30.426 |
|
From the above
figures, SUZUKI FIERO IS BEST.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
Four dimensions were considered. These are
(1) Effect of specifications on rider response – as on paper
(2) Actual On-ground performance
(3) Actual Rider convenience features and
(4) Actual Price.
Out of these four dimensions, the CBZ comes out best on (1) Effect of
on-paper specifications.
Please note that the conversion of manufacturer's specs. to in-use effect
has been done ONLY mathematically without any relation to ground realities.
, on this dimension CBZ is only THEORETICALLY best.
On the next two dimensions, (2) Actual on-ground performance and (3)
Actual Features, the Fiero is ACTUALLY best.
On the fourth dimension i.e., price, YBX is cheapest to buy.
Overall, the Suzuki Fiero comes out to be
the best double digit BHP four stroke bike in the country today. |